{
    "unit": {
        "Fallacy": {
            "FormalFallacy": "QuantificationalFallacy"
        }
    },
    "title": "Galactic Logic Academy: Mastering Quantificational Fallacies",
    "screens": [
        {
            "screen_type": "Text",
            "text": "Welcome back, Cadet! The galaxy faces new challenges, and this time, your mission is to tackle quantificational fallacies. These errors in reasoning arise when quantifiers like 'all,' 'some,' or 'none' are misused. Ready to sharpen your logical skills? Let's dive in!",
            "question": null,
            "options": null,
            "correct_indices": null,
            "correct_text": null,
            "hints": null
        },
        {
            "screen_type": "Text",
            "text": "Quantificational fallacies occur when arguments involving quantifiers fail to follow logical rules. Missteps in reasoning can lead to flawed conclusions, and as a cadet, your task is to identify and correct these errors.",
            "question": null,
            "options": null,
            "correct_indices": null,
            "correct_text": null,
            "hints": null
        },
        {
            "screen_type": "Text",
            "text": "One common quantificational fallacy is the fallacy of illicit conversion. For example, a planetary leader might argue, 'All peaceful planets trade fairly. Therefore, all planets that trade fairly are peaceful.' This reasoning is invalid.",
            "question": null,
            "options": null,
            "correct_indices": null,
            "correct_text": null,
            "hints": null
        },
        {
            "screen_type": "Mcq",
            "text": "",
            "question": "Which of the following is an example of the fallacy of illicit conversion?",
            "options": [
                "All starships that are fast are well-maintained. Therefore, all well-maintained starships are fast.",
                "Some planets with water are habitable. Therefore, some habitable planets have water.",
                "No planets with toxic atmospheres are habitable. Therefore, no habitable planets have toxic atmospheres."
            ],
            "correct_indices": [0],
            "correct_text": null,
            "hints": [
                "Illicit conversion occurs when the direction of a universal statement is reversed without justification."
            ]
        },
        {
            "screen_type": "Text",
            "text": "Another quantificational fallacy is the fallacy of existential instantiation. For instance, 'Some planets are habitable. Therefore, there exists a specific habitable planet named X.' This leap in reasoning is flawed.",
            "question": null,
            "options": null,
            "correct_indices": null,
            "correct_text": null,
            "hints": null
        },
        {
            "screen_type": "Mcq",
            "text": "",
            "question": "Which of the following is an example of the fallacy of existential instantiation?",
            "options": [
                "Some starships are fast. Therefore, there exists a specific starship named 'Speedster' that is fast.",
                "All planets with water are habitable. Therefore, some habitable planets have water.",
                "No planets with toxic atmospheres are habitable. Therefore, no habitable planets have toxic atmospheres."
            ],
            "correct_indices": [0],
            "correct_text": null,
            "hints": [
                "Existential instantiation assumes the existence of a specific instance without evidence."
            ]
        },
        {
            "screen_type": "Text",
            "text": "The fallacy of undistributed middle occurs when a shared term in two premises is not distributed, leading to an invalid conclusion. For example, 'All starships are fast. All fast objects are valuable. Therefore, all starships are valuable.'",
            "question": null,
            "options": null,
            "correct_indices": null,
            "correct_text": null,
            "hints": null
        },
        {
            "screen_type": "Checkboxes",
            "text": "",
            "question": "Which of the following are examples of the fallacy of undistributed middle? Select all that apply.",
            "options": [
                "All planets with water are habitable. All habitable planets are valuable. Therefore, all planets with water are valuable.",
                "All starships are fast. All fast objects are valuable. Therefore, all starships are valuable.",
                "All leaders are wise. All wise beings are respected. Therefore, all leaders are respected.",
                "All planets with life are unique. All unique planets are rare. Therefore, all planets with life are rare."
            ],
            "correct_indices": [0, 1, 3],
            "correct_text": null,
            "hints": [
                "The middle term must be distributed in at least one premise for the argument to be valid."
            ]
        },
        {
            "screen_type": "Text",
            "text": "Congratulations, Cadet! You've completed the Galactic Logic Academy's unit on quantificational fallacies. Your ability to identify these errors will help maintain peace and reason across the galaxy. The stars shine brighter with your wisdom!",
            "question": null,
            "options": null,
            "correct_indices": null,
            "correct_text": null,
            "hints": null
        }
    ]
}
