{
    "unit": {
        "Fallacy": {
            "InformalFallacy": "TexasSharpshooter"
        }
    },
    "title": "Galactic Logic Academy: The Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy",
    "screens": [
        {
            "screen_type": "Text",
            "text": "Welcome back, Cadet! The galaxy needs your sharp reasoning skills once again. This time, your mission is to uncover and dismantle the Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy—a deceptive reasoning pattern that can mislead even the wisest interplanetary leaders. Ready to aim for the truth? Let's begin!",
            "question": null,
            "options": null,
            "correct_indices": null,
            "correct_text": null,
            "hints": null
        },
        {
            "screen_type": "Text",
            "text": "The Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy occurs when someone cherry-picks data to fit a specific conclusion, ignoring data that doesn't support it. It's like a sharpshooter firing at a barn and then painting a target around the bullet holes to make it look like they hit the bullseye.",
            "question": null,
            "options": null,
            "correct_indices": null,
            "correct_text": null,
            "hints": null
        },
        {
            "screen_type": "Text",
            "text": "In the galaxy, this fallacy can lead to dangerous decisions. For example, a planetary leader might claim their economic policy is a success by highlighting a few thriving cities while ignoring widespread poverty elsewhere. Your task is to spot and challenge such flawed reasoning.",
            "question": null,
            "options": null,
            "correct_indices": null,
            "correct_text": null,
            "hints": null
        },
        {
            "screen_type": "Mcq",
            "text": "",
            "question": "Which of the following is an example of the Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy?",
            "options": [
                "A scientist claims their theory is correct because they found a few data points that support it, ignoring the majority of data that contradicts it.",
                "A leader argues that their planet is peaceful because there have been no wars in the last year, despite ongoing civil unrest.",
                "A trader claims their business is booming because one product is selling well, while ignoring losses in other areas."
            ],
            "correct_indices": [0, 2],
            "correct_text": null,
            "hints": [
                "Look for cases where data is selectively used to support a conclusion."
            ]
        },
        {
            "screen_type": "Text",
            "text": "The Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy often arises when people confuse correlation with causation. For example, a planetary leader might argue that their planet's prosperity is due to their policies, simply because the economy improved during their term, without considering other factors.",
            "question": null,
            "options": null,
            "correct_indices": null,
            "correct_text": null,
            "hints": null
        },
        {
            "screen_type": "Checkboxes",
            "text": "",
            "question": "Which of the following are examples of confusing correlation with causation? Select all that apply.",
            "options": [
                "Claiming that a planet's increased trade is due to a new treaty, without considering other economic factors.",
                "Arguing that a starship's improved performance is due to a new paint job, ignoring mechanical upgrades.",
                "Assuming that a planet's peace is due to a new leader, without examining other contributing factors.",
                "Believing that a species' intelligence is due to their diet, without studying other influences."
            ],
            "correct_indices": [0, 2, 3],
            "correct_text": null,
            "hints": [
                "Correlation does not always imply causation. Look for missing context or ignored variables."
            ]
        },
        {
            "screen_type": "Text",
            "text": "To avoid the Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy, always consider the full range of data and avoid cherry-picking. Ask yourself: Are there other explanations? Is the data being selectively presented to fit a narrative?",
            "question": null,
            "options": null,
            "correct_indices": null,
            "correct_text": null,
            "hints": null
        },
        {
            "screen_type": "Mcq",
            "text": "",
            "question": "How can you avoid falling into the Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy?",
            "options": [
                "Consider all available data, not just the data that supports your conclusion.",
                "Focus only on the data that aligns with your argument.",
                "Ignore contradictory evidence to strengthen your case."
            ],
            "correct_indices": [0],
            "correct_text": null,
            "hints": [
                "Avoid selective reasoning and ensure your conclusions are based on comprehensive evidence."
            ]
        },
        {
            "screen_type": "Text",
            "text": "Congratulations, Cadet! You've completed the Galactic Logic Academy's unit on the Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy. Remember, your ability to identify and challenge this fallacy is crucial for maintaining truth and justice across the galaxy. The stars shine brighter with your wisdom!",
            "question": null,
            "options": null,
            "correct_indices": null,
            "correct_text": null,
            "hints": null
        }
    ]
}